Comments on: Googling for sex http://tete-tete-tete.com/61/googling-for-sex/ Fri, 21 Nov 2008 10:16:40 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3 By: PZ Myers http://tete-tete-tete.com/61/googling-for-sex/#comment-113 PZ Myers Wed, 02 Aug 2006 23:23:05 +0000 http://tete-tete-tete.com/61/googling-for-sex/#comment-113 1. Fort Myers party 2. #14, 44, and 46 3. No. 1. Fort Myers party
2. #14, 44, and 46
3. No.

]]> By: Buck http://tete-tete-tete.com/61/googling-for-sex/#comment-111 Buck Wed, 02 Aug 2006 18:47:26 +0000 http://tete-tete-tete.com/61/googling-for-sex/#comment-111 Not surprisingly my first hit included sex and a lawsuit. No porn that I could find. For me, sex is always ambiguous. Not surprisingly my first hit included sex and a lawsuit.

No porn that I could find.

For me, sex is always ambiguous.

]]> By: dave http://tete-tete-tete.com/61/googling-for-sex/#comment-110 dave Wed, 02 Aug 2006 18:14:14 +0000 http://tete-tete-tete.com/61/googling-for-sex/#comment-110 <blockquote>Dave, you’re a clean-living, well-regarded man.</blockquote>Ha...you obviously did not look at some of the links it found. Maybe not porn, but legal cases were to be found! :)

Dave, you’re a clean-living, well-regarded man.

Ha…you obviously did not look at some of the links it found. Maybe not porn, but legal cases were to be found! :)

]]> By: RSA http://tete-tete-tete.com/61/googling-for-sex/#comment-109 RSA Wed, 02 Aug 2006 17:30:03 +0000 http://tete-tete-tete.com/61/googling-for-sex/#comment-109 Dave, you're a clean-living, well-regarded man. Smijer, I like your Latin stylings. Dave, you’re a clean-living, well-regarded man. Smijer, I like your Latin stylings.

]]> By: smijer http://tete-tete-tete.com/61/googling-for-sex/#comment-108 smijer Wed, 02 Aug 2006 17:23:46 +0000 http://tete-tete-tete.com/61/googling-for-sex/#comment-108 It isn't going to find me.... with my last name, this experiment is useless. Somewhat more interesting results if I included my only slightly less common first name. It still didn't find me, or any porn... but apparently I'm involved in the plot of a particular sex & the city episode - that was the majority of the results, including the first hit. I once just googled my name; nothing else... Some of my conymists (I just made that word up) have interesting careers. Several academics. I don't know how I got left out. It isn’t going to find me…. with my last name, this experiment is useless. Somewhat more interesting results if I included my only slightly less common first name. It still didn’t find me, or any porn… but apparently I’m involved in the plot of a particular sex & the city episode - that was the majority of the results, including the first hit. I once just googled my name; nothing else… Some of my conymists (I just made that word up) have interesting careers. Several academics. I don’t know how I got left out.

]]> By: dave http://tete-tete-tete.com/61/googling-for-sex/#comment-107 dave Wed, 02 Aug 2006 17:13:41 +0000 http://tete-tete-tete.com/61/googling-for-sex/#comment-107 Oh...and no porn. Oh…and no porn.

]]> By: dave http://tete-tete-tete.com/61/googling-for-sex/#comment-106 dave Wed, 02 Aug 2006 17:13:05 +0000 http://tete-tete-tete.com/61/googling-for-sex/#comment-106 Ha...I showed up <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=lowitzki+sex&start=0&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official" rel="nofollow">number one</a>. Ha…I showed up number one.

]]>