<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Both Wrong</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tete-tete-tete.com/576/both-wrong/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tete-tete-tete.com/576/both-wrong/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 23:13:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Buck</title>
		<link>http://tete-tete-tete.com/576/both-wrong/#comment-43135</link>
		<dc:creator>Buck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 20:27:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tete-tete-tete.com/?p=576#comment-43135</guid>
		<description>I think Obama and McCain both need to stay as far away from preachers as they possibly can.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Obama and McCain both need to stay as far away from preachers as they possibly can.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: smijer</title>
		<link>http://tete-tete-tete.com/576/both-wrong/#comment-43124</link>
		<dc:creator>smijer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 14:42:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tete-tete-tete.com/?p=576#comment-43124</guid>
		<description>I write a blog, which by definition is a collection of tempests in teacups.  Yes, McCain is the GOP candidate, but he isn't the one who responded to Obama's comments.

There is evidence in the quoted article, enough to raise the suspicion that Obama follows the erroneous modern thinking that Leviticus is unique in its bad ideas about gay people. 

If you want something disparaging about McCain, I can only oblige you with the bleeding obvious.  Here's one: I suspect McCain converted to the more conservative SBC from his more mainline Episcopalian roots for political reasons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I write a blog, which by definition is a collection of tempests in teacups.  Yes, McCain is the GOP candidate, but he isn&#8217;t the one who responded to Obama&#8217;s comments.</p>
<p>There is evidence in the quoted article, enough to raise the suspicion that Obama follows the erroneous modern thinking that Leviticus is unique in its bad ideas about gay people. </p>
<p>If you want something disparaging about McCain, I can only oblige you with the bleeding obvious.  Here&#8217;s one: I suspect McCain converted to the more conservative SBC from his more mainline Episcopalian roots for political reasons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck B.</title>
		<link>http://tete-tete-tete.com/576/both-wrong/#comment-43123</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 13:48:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tete-tete-tete.com/?p=576#comment-43123</guid>
		<description>I'm not really sure of your purpose for this tempest in the tea cup. 

There's little in the article that says this disagreement was going to explode as you fear. As far as I know McCaine, not Dobson is Obama's competitor. 

Well...it does let you make a disparaging remark about Obama and what he may or may not believe without any evidense to support it. 

And of course you make no such comment about McCaine at all...hmmm. Interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not really sure of your purpose for this tempest in the tea cup. </p>
<p>There&#8217;s little in the article that says this disagreement was going to explode as you fear. As far as I know McCaine, not Dobson is Obama&#8217;s competitor. </p>
<p>Well&#8230;it does let you make a disparaging remark about Obama and what he may or may not believe without any evidense to support it. </p>
<p>And of course you make no such comment about McCaine at all&#8230;hmmm. Interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
