<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Da Bears?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tete-tete-tete.com/427/da-bears/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tete-tete-tete.com/427/da-bears/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 01:08:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: jadarm</title>
		<link>http://tete-tete-tete.com/427/da-bears/#comment-35687</link>
		<dc:creator>jadarm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 16:20:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tete-tete-tete.com/427/da-bears/#comment-35687</guid>
		<description>I doubt he will have a long professional career.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I doubt he will have a long professional career.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Davey</title>
		<link>http://tete-tete-tete.com/427/da-bears/#comment-35683</link>
		<dc:creator>Davey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 15:46:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tete-tete-tete.com/427/da-bears/#comment-35683</guid>
		<description>Makes you wonder what they're puttin' in the water at those schools, don't it??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Makes you wonder what they&#8217;re puttin&#8217; in the water at those schools, don&#8217;t it??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: smijer</title>
		<link>http://tete-tete-tete.com/427/da-bears/#comment-35345</link>
		<dc:creator>smijer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 23:11:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tete-tete-tete.com/427/da-bears/#comment-35345</guid>
		<description>jadarm asked for help with the busted link from above (this cat).  The WP version installed here is buggy with comment editing so &lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/09/sports/ncaabasketball/09asheville.html?ref=sports" rel="nofollow"&gt;here is the link&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jadarm asked for help with the busted link from above (this cat).  The WP version installed here is buggy with comment editing so <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/09/sports/ncaabasketball/09asheville.html?ref=sports" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview ('/outbound/www.nytimes.com');">here is the link</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jadarm</title>
		<link>http://tete-tete-tete.com/427/da-bears/#comment-35344</link>
		<dc:creator>jadarm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 23:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tete-tete-tete.com/427/da-bears/#comment-35344</guid>
		<description>I think teams today spend more money on scouting and development and the games reach people all over the globe. Also, training techniques have been specialized as have PEDs and HGH can still not be tested reliably.

As for the tall people out there playing basketball, I saw &lt;u&gt;this cat&lt;/u&gt; on ESPN the other day. 7 feet 7 inches tall - 360 lbs - with an 8 foot wingspan. He is currently playing with the University of North Carolina-Asheville men’s basketball team. He has trouble getting up and down the court sometimes but all he has to do is stand under the basket.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think teams today spend more money on scouting and development and the games reach people all over the globe. Also, training techniques have been specialized as have PEDs and HGH can still not be tested reliably.</p>
<p>As for the tall people out there playing basketball, I saw <u>this cat</u> on ESPN the other day. 7 feet 7 inches tall - 360 lbs - with an 8 foot wingspan. He is currently playing with the University of North Carolina-Asheville men’s basketball team. He has trouble getting up and down the court sometimes but all he has to do is stand under the basket.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RW</title>
		<link>http://tete-tete-tete.com/427/da-bears/#comment-35326</link>
		<dc:creator>RW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 16:58:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tete-tete-tete.com/427/da-bears/#comment-35326</guid>
		<description>I remember the ABA slam-dunk contest where Dr. J dunked from the free-throw line &#38; it was considered something along the lines of Bob Beamon.  Twenty years later almost every person in the NBA slam-dunk contest can do one of those.  

Go look at one generation ago in the NBA; Alvin Robertson, Gus Williams, Dennis Johnson, Lafayette Lever, Sidney Moncrief.  Not just players in the NBA, but members of the All-Pro teams from the 80s.  Today, every one of those guys would be told that they would be 'slow' point guards because they're all too short to play the #2, where 6'6" is the average.  Jamaal Wilkes would be out of place as a 6'6" small forward &#38; would be dominated in the post by today's version of the small forward, like a 6'9" Shawn Marion.

Dunno if it's the influx of European players or a wider pool of talent than the past, but basketball at all levels shows a larger average size &#38; skill set than a mere 25 years ago. Remember, Michael Jordan was a small forward at UNC &#38; was considered a 'big' #2 guard at 6'6".  Today?  He'd have to go up against Kobe Bryant &#38; Dwayne Wade, both larger than he.

And they're still growing.....


-

&lt;blockquote&gt;I don’t know what it is that has made the changes but nowadays over 6′4″ and over 300 pounds just is not that unusual.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
For every sport other than football linemen: It wasn't that long ago - I remember because it was told to me while I played - that weight lifting was considered an anathema because it would 'mess up your timing and coordination', so many stayed away.  Now, it's known to be one of the best things that can most athletes can do, so that alone is adding ten to twenty percent to their frames/sizes.

Twenty-five years ago a phenom like Dwight Howard would be the biggest name in sports because he's a seven footer who can jump through the roof and dominate the middle; today, he's an afterthought because the league is filled with 6'7" high flyers that comprise most of the ESPN highlights.

Terry Bradshaw, Pat Haden, Roger Staubach, all from one generation ago (or so) and all wouldn't even be scouted by the NFL or at least be given the Doug Flutie 'prove yourself in the CFL' treatment because they were much too small to see over today's massive lines.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember the ABA slam-dunk contest where Dr. J dunked from the free-throw line &amp; it was considered something along the lines of Bob Beamon.  Twenty years later almost every person in the NBA slam-dunk contest can do one of those.  </p>
<p>Go look at one generation ago in the NBA; Alvin Robertson, Gus Williams, Dennis Johnson, Lafayette Lever, Sidney Moncrief.  Not just players in the NBA, but members of the All-Pro teams from the 80s.  Today, every one of those guys would be told that they would be &#8217;slow&#8217; point guards because they&#8217;re all too short to play the #2, where 6&#8242;6&#8243; is the average.  Jamaal Wilkes would be out of place as a 6&#8242;6&#8243; small forward &amp; would be dominated in the post by today&#8217;s version of the small forward, like a 6&#8242;9&#8243; Shawn Marion.</p>
<p>Dunno if it&#8217;s the influx of European players or a wider pool of talent than the past, but basketball at all levels shows a larger average size &amp; skill set than a mere 25 years ago. Remember, Michael Jordan was a small forward at UNC &amp; was considered a &#8216;big&#8217; #2 guard at 6&#8242;6&#8243;.  Today?  He&#8217;d have to go up against Kobe Bryant &amp; Dwayne Wade, both larger than he.</p>
<p>And they&#8217;re still growing&#8230;..</p>
<p>-</p>
<blockquote><p>I don’t know what it is that has made the changes but nowadays over 6′4″ and over 300 pounds just is not that unusual.</p></blockquote>
<p>For every sport other than football linemen: It wasn&#8217;t that long ago - I remember because it was told to me while I played - that weight lifting was considered an anathema because it would &#8216;mess up your timing and coordination&#8217;, so many stayed away.  Now, it&#8217;s known to be one of the best things that can most athletes can do, so that alone is adding ten to twenty percent to their frames/sizes.</p>
<p>Twenty-five years ago a phenom like Dwight Howard would be the biggest name in sports because he&#8217;s a seven footer who can jump through the roof and dominate the middle; today, he&#8217;s an afterthought because the league is filled with 6&#8242;7&#8243; high flyers that comprise most of the ESPN highlights.</p>
<p>Terry Bradshaw, Pat Haden, Roger Staubach, all from one generation ago (or so) and all wouldn&#8217;t even be scouted by the NFL or at least be given the Doug Flutie &#8216;prove yourself in the CFL&#8217; treatment because they were much too small to see over today&#8217;s massive lines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buck</title>
		<link>http://tete-tete-tete.com/427/da-bears/#comment-35322</link>
		<dc:creator>Buck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 15:34:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tete-tete-tete.com/427/da-bears/#comment-35322</guid>
		<description>It is great fun to go back and look at the linemen that used to wear the leather helmets.

Offensive and defensive linemen weighing in at 160 pounds.

I don't know what it is that has made the changes but nowadays over 6'4" and over 300 pounds just is not that unusual.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is great fun to go back and look at the linemen that used to wear the leather helmets.</p>
<p>Offensive and defensive linemen weighing in at 160 pounds.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know what it is that has made the changes but nowadays over 6&#8242;4&#8243; and over 300 pounds just is not that unusual.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: smijer</title>
		<link>http://tete-tete-tete.com/427/da-bears/#comment-35320</link>
		<dc:creator>smijer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 15:19:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tete-tete-tete.com/427/da-bears/#comment-35320</guid>
		<description>I don't think it's a genetic thing.  The guys playing today are barely a generation removed from the guys playing in the 70's... not much time for movement in the gene pool. It may have to do with  advances in training schedules &#038; methods, better (legit) supplements, and / or under the counter pharmaceuticals. You're right, though.  The guys playing today are monsters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s a genetic thing.  The guys playing today are barely a generation removed from the guys playing in the 70&#8217;s&#8230; not much time for movement in the gene pool. It may have to do with  advances in training schedules &#038; methods, better (legit) supplements, and / or under the counter pharmaceuticals. You&#8217;re right, though.  The guys playing today are monsters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RW</title>
		<link>http://tete-tete-tete.com/427/da-bears/#comment-35317</link>
		<dc:creator>RW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 13:32:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tete-tete-tete.com/427/da-bears/#comment-35317</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Whether they would have beaten the ‘72 Dolphins or the ‘85 Bears is just pure speculation and there is no way to ever know.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Eh, evolution (as in the classic definition, not "a cell later became an ape that later became man") and sports advancements pretty much makes such speculation rather, er, speculative.  The average pro athlete of today is much bigger, stronger, faster and, thus, better, than that of 20 years ago.  Or 10.  Or 5.  There are always exceptions (Wilt, Jordan, Tiger) but as a general rule, "sport" advances.  A collection of individuals on a team makes the "exceptions" part pretty much implausible.  Sure, an individual player on da Bears could still be dominant today (transplant the 1985 Mike Singletary in 2007's Bears LB corps and he'd still be the premiere linebacker in the game) but an entire team?  Nah.  The offensive lines are bigger &#38; stronger today.  The RBs and WRss are faster AND stronger...and jump higher.  And are more athletic.  The DBS are faster &#38; stronger &#38; quicker.  

Don't get me wrong, Nolan Ryan throwing a pea 101 MPH in 1972 is still a 101 pea in 2008, but.....well, you get my drift.  Lotta guys are throwing 100 nowadays &#38; someone who can't throw 90 is considered a "junkballer".  Look at the sizes of the lines from the 70s &#38; 80s and you'd have them steamrolled by the 6'7"/320lb behomoths and genetic freaks of today.


My two cents, at least.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Whether they would have beaten the ‘72 Dolphins or the ‘85 Bears is just pure speculation and there is no way to ever know.</p></blockquote>
<p>Eh, evolution (as in the classic definition, not &#8220;a cell later became an ape that later became man&#8221;) and sports advancements pretty much makes such speculation rather, er, speculative.  The average pro athlete of today is much bigger, stronger, faster and, thus, better, than that of 20 years ago.  Or 10.  Or 5.  There are always exceptions (Wilt, Jordan, Tiger) but as a general rule, &#8220;sport&#8221; advances.  A collection of individuals on a team makes the &#8220;exceptions&#8221; part pretty much implausible.  Sure, an individual player on da Bears could still be dominant today (transplant the 1985 Mike Singletary in 2007&#8217;s Bears LB corps and he&#8217;d still be the premiere linebacker in the game) but an entire team?  Nah.  The offensive lines are bigger &amp; stronger today.  The RBs and WRss are faster AND stronger&#8230;and jump higher.  And are more athletic.  The DBS are faster &amp; stronger &amp; quicker.  </p>
<p>Don&#8217;t get me wrong, Nolan Ryan throwing a pea 101 MPH in 1972 is still a 101 pea in 2008, but&#8230;..well, you get my drift.  Lotta guys are throwing 100 nowadays &amp; someone who can&#8217;t throw 90 is considered a &#8220;junkballer&#8221;.  Look at the sizes of the lines from the 70s &amp; 80s and you&#8217;d have them steamrolled by the 6&#8242;7&#8243;/320lb behomoths and genetic freaks of today.</p>
<p>My two cents, at least.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jadarm</title>
		<link>http://tete-tete-tete.com/427/da-bears/#comment-35286</link>
		<dc:creator>jadarm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 01:05:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tete-tete-tete.com/427/da-bears/#comment-35286</guid>
		<description>True, they cannot be given the status as "greatest ever" if they dont beat the Giants. They can be an "honerable mention" at best. 

RW, I love the analogy to the 93' Braves. Their 104 win season was excruciating and was probably the reason the wild card was established in MLB. How in the world do the San Francisco Giants win 103 games and not make the playoffs? But, I think that their hard drive to win the division that year ultimately left them exhausted which is why they didnt advance further that year. 
&lt;blockquote&gt;Must be the fertilizer - what do your think? Bear crap?&lt;/blockquote&gt;
...I dont know smij....if I didnt know better I would think that someone is on the New England sidelines with a video camera trying to steal signs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True, they cannot be given the status as &#8220;greatest ever&#8221; if they dont beat the Giants. They can be an &#8220;honerable mention&#8221; at best. </p>
<p>RW, I love the analogy to the 93&#8242; Braves. Their 104 win season was excruciating and was probably the reason the wild card was established in MLB. How in the world do the San Francisco Giants win 103 games and not make the playoffs? But, I think that their hard drive to win the division that year ultimately left them exhausted which is why they didnt advance further that year. </p>
<blockquote><p>Must be the fertilizer - what do your think? Bear crap?</p></blockquote>
<p>&#8230;I dont know smij&#8230;.if I didnt know better I would think that someone is on the New England sidelines with a video camera trying to steal signs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: smijer</title>
		<link>http://tete-tete-tete.com/427/da-bears/#comment-35271</link>
		<dc:creator>smijer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 20:56:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tete-tete-tete.com/427/da-bears/#comment-35271</guid>
		<description>I swear I have never seen offensive tomatoes as prolific as the ones there in Massachussetts.  Must be the fertilizer - what do your think? Bear crap?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I swear I have never seen offensive tomatoes as prolific as the ones there in Massachussetts.  Must be the fertilizer - what do your think? Bear crap?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
