<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What kind of religion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tete-tete-tete.com/2009/08/what-kind-of-religio/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tete-tete-tete.com/2009/08/what-kind-of-religio/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 07:49:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: smijer</title>
		<link>http://tete-tete-tete.com/2009/08/what-kind-of-religio/comment-page-1/#comment-3745</link>
		<dc:creator>smijer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 18:09:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tete-tete-tete.com/?p=2278#comment-3745</guid>
		<description>Funnily enough most, but not all, of modern Christians that you r criteria would exclude would be theologically liberal Christians.  I think that your criteria might exclude the Twelve, the Jerusalem church for as long as it existed and large swaths of early Christianity that couldn&#039;t be characterized as &quot;liberal&quot; or &quot;conservativie&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funnily enough most, but not all, of modern Christians that you r criteria would exclude would be theologically liberal Christians.  I think that your criteria might exclude the Twelve, the Jerusalem church for as long as it existed and large swaths of early Christianity that couldn&#8217;t be characterized as &#8220;liberal&#8221; or &#8220;conservativie&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: smijer</title>
		<link>http://tete-tete-tete.com/2009/08/what-kind-of-religio/comment-page-1/#comment-3744</link>
		<dc:creator>smijer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 18:05:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tete-tete-tete.com/?p=2278#comment-3744</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;here are Christians who disagree on any number of things &amp; politics is right there alongside favorite-college-football-team on the “items that don’t really matter” list. Jesus didn’t care if you were liberal or conservative, politically.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

You and I seem to agree on the central point.  I think what we disagree on is how properly to define &quot;Christian&quot;. I don&#039;t see my definition as a laundry list - I see it as pragmatic.  One who self-identifies as a follower of Jesus is a Christian... I can see no grounds for excluding them over different views of the Bible, different notions of the afterlife, or different ideas about what Jesus did or didn&#039;t do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>here are Christians who disagree on any number of things &#038; politics is right there alongside favorite-college-football-team on the “items that don’t really matter” list. Jesus didn’t care if you were liberal or conservative, politically.</p></blockquote>
<p>You and I seem to agree on the central point.  I think what we disagree on is how properly to define &#8220;Christian&#8221;. I don&#8217;t see my definition as a laundry list &#8211; I see it as pragmatic.  One who self-identifies as a follower of Jesus is a Christian&#8230; I can see no grounds for excluding them over different views of the Bible, different notions of the afterlife, or different ideas about what Jesus did or didn&#8217;t do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: smijer</title>
		<link>http://tete-tete-tete.com/2009/08/what-kind-of-religio/comment-page-1/#comment-3743</link>
		<dc:creator>smijer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 18:01:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tete-tete-tete.com/?p=2278#comment-3743</guid>
		<description>I could have been pickier still and said &quot;not John&#039;s but those of the author of the 4th Gospel&quot;.  But that&#039;s getting ridiculous.  Still I think those words would include Christians both ancient and modern that the definition you gave in your first comment would exclude. IOW, in this passage, John doesn&#039;t rule out the possibility that one could   come to the Father &quot;by&quot; Jesus without believing that Jesus was (in any literal or unique sense) the Son of God, or that his death was &quot;for the sins&quot; of mankind... or that he necessarily rose &quot;from the tomb&quot; (as opposed to a spiritual resurrection) or that there would be a &quot;second coming&quot; in the future. 

And in fact, many people believe(d) they would come to the father without believing one or more of those other things. And some &quot;followers of Jesus&quot; don&#039;t even believe in an afterlife or in the resurrection of the dead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I could have been pickier still and said &#8220;not John&#8217;s but those of the author of the 4th Gospel&#8221;.  But that&#8217;s getting ridiculous.  Still I think those words would include Christians both ancient and modern that the definition you gave in your first comment would exclude. IOW, in this passage, John doesn&#8217;t rule out the possibility that one could   come to the Father &#8220;by&#8221; Jesus without believing that Jesus was (in any literal or unique sense) the Son of God, or that his death was &#8220;for the sins&#8221; of mankind&#8230; or that he necessarily rose &#8220;from the tomb&#8221; (as opposed to a spiritual resurrection) or that there would be a &#8220;second coming&#8221; in the future. </p>
<p>And in fact, many people believe(d) they would come to the father without believing one or more of those other things. And some &#8220;followers of Jesus&#8221; don&#8217;t even believe in an afterlife or in the resurrection of the dead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RW</title>
		<link>http://tete-tete-tete.com/2009/08/what-kind-of-religio/comment-page-1/#comment-3742</link>
		<dc:creator>RW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 18:01:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tete-tete-tete.com/?p=2278#comment-3742</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I prefer a definition....&lt;/blockquote&gt;
There isn&#039;t a laundry list to choose from.

There are liberals who are Christians.  There are conservatives who are Christians.

There aren&#039;t &quot;liberal Christians&quot; any more than there are &quot;conservative Christians&quot;; a mechanism is being put forward to simply compartmentalize the &quot;good&quot; (the liberal, positive) kind from the &quot;not so good&quot; (conservative, anti-whatevercomestomind) kind.  Again, that&#039;s no different than saying left-handed Christian or right-handed Christian.  One either believes, has faith in, and is obedient to the words of Christ (accepting that mankind will fall short on the &#039;obedient&#039; part, as we are sinners), or one isn&#039;t.  Reading the text to say what we want it to say is just another example of what Madonna did during her &#039;cafeteria Catholic&#039; days.  There are Christians who disagree on any number of things &amp; politics is right there alongside favorite-college-football-team on the &quot;items that don&#039;t really matter&quot; list.  Jesus didn&#039;t care if you were liberal or conservative, politically.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I prefer a definition&#8230;.</p></blockquote>
<p>There isn&#8217;t a laundry list to choose from.</p>
<p>There are liberals who are Christians.  There are conservatives who are Christians.</p>
<p>There aren&#8217;t &#8220;liberal Christians&#8221; any more than there are &#8220;conservative Christians&#8221;; a mechanism is being put forward to simply compartmentalize the &#8220;good&#8221; (the liberal, positive) kind from the &#8220;not so good&#8221; (conservative, anti-whatevercomestomind) kind.  Again, that&#8217;s no different than saying left-handed Christian or right-handed Christian.  One either believes, has faith in, and is obedient to the words of Christ (accepting that mankind will fall short on the &#8216;obedient&#8217; part, as we are sinners), or one isn&#8217;t.  Reading the text to say what we want it to say is just another example of what Madonna did during her &#8216;cafeteria Catholic&#8217; days.  There are Christians who disagree on any number of things &amp; politics is right there alongside favorite-college-football-team on the &#8220;items that don&#8217;t really matter&#8221; list.  Jesus didn&#8217;t care if you were liberal or conservative, politically.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: smijer</title>
		<link>http://tete-tete-tete.com/2009/08/what-kind-of-religio/comment-page-1/#comment-3741</link>
		<dc:creator>smijer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 17:56:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tete-tete-tete.com/?p=2278#comment-3741</guid>
		<description>If I wanted to be picky, I would say, &quot;not Jesus&#039;, John&#039;s - since those words were likely never uttered by Jesus himself.&quot; 

But I don&#039;t want to be picky. :) I was just saying that the sentiment you expressed was similar to the one I was expressing, just with a bit of a different angle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I wanted to be picky, I would say, &#8220;not Jesus&#8217;, John&#8217;s &#8211; since those words were likely never uttered by Jesus himself.&#8221; </p>
<p>But I don&#8217;t want to be picky. <img src='http://tete-tete-tete.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  I was just saying that the sentiment you expressed was similar to the one I was expressing, just with a bit of a different angle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RW</title>
		<link>http://tete-tete-tete.com/2009/08/what-kind-of-religio/comment-page-1/#comment-3740</link>
		<dc:creator>RW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 17:48:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tete-tete-tete.com/?p=2278#comment-3740</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;from your own direction, &lt;/blockquote&gt;
Not mine, Jesus&#039;.

&quot;I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, &lt;b&gt;but by me&lt;/b&gt;.&quot;
If one believes the words of Jesus, then one is not [left] out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>from your own direction, </p></blockquote>
<p>Not mine, Jesus&#8217;.</p>
<p>&#8220;I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, <b>but by me</b>.&#8221;<br />
If one believes the words of Jesus, then one is not [left] out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: smijer</title>
		<link>http://tete-tete-tete.com/2009/08/what-kind-of-religio/comment-page-1/#comment-3739</link>
		<dc:creator>smijer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 17:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tete-tete-tete.com/?p=2278#comment-3739</guid>
		<description>It sounds like you are, from your own direction, agreeing with me. 

Of course I have to point out that the definition you give of Christian leaves out a number of modern liberal Christians... certainly a large number of early Christians, and if I had my guess probably leaves out the Apostles (minus Paul), and Jesus himself.

I prefer a definition that includes all &quot;followers&quot; of Jesus - which would include the groups I described above, except Jesus himself - his religion was the Jewish one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It sounds like you are, from your own direction, agreeing with me. </p>
<p>Of course I have to point out that the definition you give of Christian leaves out a number of modern liberal Christians&#8230; certainly a large number of early Christians, and if I had my guess probably leaves out the Apostles (minus Paul), and Jesus himself.</p>
<p>I prefer a definition that includes all &#8220;followers&#8221; of Jesus &#8211; which would include the groups I described above, except Jesus himself &#8211; his religion was the Jewish one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RW</title>
		<link>http://tete-tete-tete.com/2009/08/what-kind-of-religio/comment-page-1/#comment-3738</link>
		<dc:creator>RW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 16:57:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tete-tete-tete.com/?p=2278#comment-3738</guid>
		<description>Reminds me of one of my favorite songs of faith:

&lt;blockquote&gt;It&#039;s not conservative or liberal,
However they&#039;re defined;
It&#039;s not about interpretation,
Or the judgment of the mind;

It&#039;s the opposite of politics,
Power or prestige;
It&#039;s about a simple message,
And whether we believe.

It&#039;s still the cross,
It&#039;s still the blood of Calvary;
That cleanses sins,
And sets the captives free.
It&#039;s still the name,
The name of Jesus,
That has power to save the lost;
It&#039;s still the cross.

We can water down theology,
And preach a word to suit our needs;
We can justify sweet subtle lies,
That are wrapped in noble deeds;

We can alter our convictions,
To adapt to social whims;
But we cannot change the gospel,
Or the truth contained within.

It&#039;s still the cross,
It&#039;s still the blood of Calvary;
That cleanses sins,
And sets the captives free.
It&#039;s still the name,
The name of Jesus,
That has power to save the lost;
It&#039;s still the cross.

Though some may say it&#039;s man&#039;s religion,
Or ancient history;
The cross of Jesus still remains,
The price for sin that sets us free.

It&#039;s still the cross,
It&#039;s still the blood of Calvary;
That cleanses sins,
And sets the captives free.
It&#039;s still the name,
The name of Jesus,
That has power to save the lost;
It&#039;s still the cross.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reminds me of one of my favorite songs of faith:</p>
<blockquote><p>It&#8217;s not conservative or liberal,<br />
However they&#8217;re defined;<br />
It&#8217;s not about interpretation,<br />
Or the judgment of the mind;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s the opposite of politics,<br />
Power or prestige;<br />
It&#8217;s about a simple message,<br />
And whether we believe.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s still the cross,<br />
It&#8217;s still the blood of Calvary;<br />
That cleanses sins,<br />
And sets the captives free.<br />
It&#8217;s still the name,<br />
The name of Jesus,<br />
That has power to save the lost;<br />
It&#8217;s still the cross.</p>
<p>We can water down theology,<br />
And preach a word to suit our needs;<br />
We can justify sweet subtle lies,<br />
That are wrapped in noble deeds;</p>
<p>We can alter our convictions,<br />
To adapt to social whims;<br />
But we cannot change the gospel,<br />
Or the truth contained within.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s still the cross,<br />
It&#8217;s still the blood of Calvary;<br />
That cleanses sins,<br />
And sets the captives free.<br />
It&#8217;s still the name,<br />
The name of Jesus,<br />
That has power to save the lost;<br />
It&#8217;s still the cross.</p>
<p>Though some may say it&#8217;s man&#8217;s religion,<br />
Or ancient history;<br />
The cross of Jesus still remains,<br />
The price for sin that sets us free.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s still the cross,<br />
It&#8217;s still the blood of Calvary;<br />
That cleanses sins,<br />
And sets the captives free.<br />
It&#8217;s still the name,<br />
The name of Jesus,<br />
That has power to save the lost;<br />
It&#8217;s still the cross.
</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RW</title>
		<link>http://tete-tete-tete.com/2009/08/what-kind-of-religio/comment-page-1/#comment-3737</link>
		<dc:creator>RW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 16:46:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tete-tete-tete.com/?p=2278#comment-3737</guid>
		<description>Being a Christian has nothing to do with being liberal or conservative.  
Jesus wasn’t a liberal.  
Jesus wasn’t a conservative.  
People too often lie to themselves while trying to contort the scripture in such a way so that the text ‘really’ says what it needs to say in order to assuage their political sensibilities.  Saying liberal Christian or conservative Christian is akin to saying liberal ditch-digger or conservative Dentist; one has nothing to do with the other. 

If one believes that Jesus Christ is the son of God, the risen savior who died for the sins of mankind and who rose from the tomb to one day return, who is the one true way to heaven…then they are a Christian.  The liberal/conservative stuff is an aside &amp; has nothing to do with the obedience of God’s word and worship of the Lord.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Being a Christian has nothing to do with being liberal or conservative.<br />
Jesus wasn’t a liberal.<br />
Jesus wasn’t a conservative.<br />
People too often lie to themselves while trying to contort the scripture in such a way so that the text ‘really’ says what it needs to say in order to assuage their political sensibilities.  Saying liberal Christian or conservative Christian is akin to saying liberal ditch-digger or conservative Dentist; one has nothing to do with the other. </p>
<p>If one believes that Jesus Christ is the son of God, the risen savior who died for the sins of mankind and who rose from the tomb to one day return, who is the one true way to heaven…then they are a Christian.  The liberal/conservative stuff is an aside &amp; has nothing to do with the obedience of God’s word and worship of the Lord.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

