<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Relation versus Belief</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tete-tete-tete.com/2009/02/relation-versus-belief/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tete-tete-tete.com/2009/02/relation-versus-belief/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 07:49:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://tete-tete-tete.com/2009/02/relation-versus-belief/comment-page-1/#comment-2363</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 21:28:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tete-tete-tete.com/?p=863#comment-2363</guid>
		<description>Thanks for engaging in this and for connecting those two sermons.  You, of course, know what I base my filter on, since you read the sermon.  I appreciate your thoughts on the subject.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for engaging in this and for connecting those two sermons.  You, of course, know what I base my filter on, since you read the sermon.  I appreciate your thoughts on the subject.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron</title>
		<link>http://tete-tete-tete.com/2009/02/relation-versus-belief/comment-page-1/#comment-2364</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 16:28:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tete-tete-tete.com/?p=863#comment-2364</guid>
		<description>Nice post, smijer!  I&#039;ve been talking along those lines for a while now at my websites.  The emphasis on correctness of belief sure seems to miss the mark in our particular mode of liberal religion. The old radical Reformation idea of &quot;holy spirit&quot; is taken far too literally, seems to me, and I would suggest that pres. Obama is described that &quot;spirit&quot; as well as anybody in his talk this morning at the prayer breakfast, saying that... &quot;Too often, we have seen faith wielded as a tool to divide us from one another.&quot;  Some may--and obviously do--see it differently, but I too (silly Universalist that I am) see &quot;the holy spirit&quot; as a spirit that ultimately unites instead of divides, regardless of our particular opinions in matters of theology or the Great Mystery.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post, smijer!  I&#8217;ve been talking along those lines for a while now at my websites.  The emphasis on correctness of belief sure seems to miss the mark in our particular mode of liberal religion. The old radical Reformation idea of &#8220;holy spirit&#8221; is taken far too literally, seems to me, and I would suggest that pres. Obama is described that &#8220;spirit&#8221; as well as anybody in his talk this morning at the prayer breakfast, saying that&#8230; &#8220;Too often, we have seen faith wielded as a tool to divide us from one another.&#8221;  Some may&#8211;and obviously do&#8211;see it differently, but I too (silly Universalist that I am) see &#8220;the holy spirit&#8221; as a spirit that ultimately unites instead of divides, regardless of our particular opinions in matters of theology or the Great Mystery.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

