<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: If our orbit wuz elliptical</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tete-tete-tete.com/2008/05/if-our-orbit-wuz-elliptical/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tete-tete-tete.com/2008/05/if-our-orbit-wuz-elliptical/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 07:49:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tête-à-Tête-Tête - &#187; More Creationism, Science, and Religion</title>
		<link>http://tete-tete-tete.com/2008/05/if-our-orbit-wuz-elliptical/comment-page-1/#comment-1910</link>
		<dc:creator>Tête-à-Tête-Tête - &#187; More Creationism, Science, and Religion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 12:36:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tete-tete-tete.com/?p=554#comment-1910</guid>
		<description>[...] Collins and many other theistic evolutionists often make some terrible mistakes in employing the fine tuning argument, those aren&#8217;t hard mistakes to make and are not central to the task of reconciling faith and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Collins and many other theistic evolutionists often make some terrible mistakes in employing the fine tuning argument, those aren&#8217;t hard mistakes to make and are not central to the task of reconciling faith and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buck</title>
		<link>http://tete-tete-tete.com/2008/05/if-our-orbit-wuz-elliptical/comment-page-1/#comment-1909</link>
		<dc:creator>Buck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 12:27:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tete-tete-tete.com/?p=554#comment-1909</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;My own viewpoint on religion, generally speaking, has changed a lot in the last few years. I’m much more tolerant, accepting, and in some cases even encouraging of religious devotion than I was just a few years ago.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I have noticed that and I see it as a positive. To get tolerance of religious devotion from the scientific community is a win. I won&#039;t even expect encouragement.

I have never been one to feel that intelligent design and evolution are mutally exclusive.

I think that &quot;Let There Be Light&quot; is a good way to describe the Big Bang.

But as a general rule I stay on the outside looking in when it comes to this argument. Experience has taught me that the claws can really come out from both sides on this one.

It is more fun to watch than to participate in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>My own viewpoint on religion, generally speaking, has changed a lot in the last few years. I’m much more tolerant, accepting, and in some cases even encouraging of religious devotion than I was just a few years ago.</p></blockquote>
<p>I have noticed that and I see it as a positive. To get tolerance of religious devotion from the scientific community is a win. I won&#8217;t even expect encouragement.</p>
<p>I have never been one to feel that intelligent design and evolution are mutally exclusive.</p>
<p>I think that &#8220;Let There Be Light&#8221; is a good way to describe the Big Bang.</p>
<p>But as a general rule I stay on the outside looking in when it comes to this argument. Experience has taught me that the claws can really come out from both sides on this one.</p>
<p>It is more fun to watch than to participate in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

