Harold Ford, Jr. - I’d like to make a request.


Ok, a front page piece in the Chattanooga TFP today (yesterday when this will be posted) gives a surprisingly fair reading of Corker’s attacks on Ford as a liberal, and Ford’s actual position. Great. But, deep inside, where the column is continued on page A6, is a quote from Ford that has rather disquieted me in my support for him. Here it is:

Liberals in Washington think I’m too conservative because I love Jesus and I’m head of the faith-based caucus, and I like the military. I support spending on them.

Problem One: It is a lie. Most liberals who think that Ford is too conservative also think that Jimmy Carter is just right, and Carter loves Jesus at least as much as Ford does. The same group likes everybody from John Kerry to Hillary Clinton, and these guys like spending on the troops (probably more so than their conservative counterparts these days). The people who think that Ford is too conservative absolutely love Jim Webb - and check out this ad supporting him. Ok, so Ford’s statement is a lie.

Problem Two: It’s a lie crafted by Republicans from Nixon to Atwater to Reed to Rove for no other purpose but to smear and demonize Democrats and boost their own electoral chances.

Ouch. Why would someone who depends on Democratic support be so quick to dishonestly undermine his party in order to boost his own electoral chances? Don’t know. Ask Joe Lieberman. I’d like to request something of Ford… I’ll e-mail this to his campaign & see what I hear back. Here’s a radical suggestion: Boost your conservative creds in any number of legitimate ways. For your resume, without accusing liberals of hating Jesus and the troops:

You are against so-called partial birth abortion, even when the baby is brain-dead from hydroencephaly and it is the safest option available to save the life of the woman. So say it - “I’m against ‘partial birth’ abortion.” (At least be honest enough to use the scare quotes.)

You are against inclusive legal institutions for gays, despite being of a race that was once itself excluded from equal access to the legal institutions. So say it, “I voted to ban gay marriage.”

You are for faith based social initiatives, even though the ultimate result is that our tax money goes to support the proselytization efforts of religious groups that we do not necessarily support. So say it: “I’m for faith based initiatives”… Ok - you did that one already… fine.

You voted, without apology, to give Bush authorization (really, a blank check) to invade Iraq. Say it.

And earn yourself a pro-gun voting record for next time, so you can say, “I won the endorsement of the American Hunters and Shooters association“… or even the NRA (wholly owned subsidiary of the GOP and gun manufacturers association).

But… when you talk about how much you love Jesus, tell ‘em you love Jesus just like many from both sides of the political spectrum. And when you talk about how you love the troops, tell ‘em you love ‘em just like many from both sides of the political spectrum.

Clean it up, please. I want to support someone electable who will caucus with the Democrats.

Information and Links

Join the fray by commenting, tracking what others have to say, or linking to it from your blog.


Other Posts
Is This a Single Link Post?
There Should be a Cutesy Quiz

Write a Comment

Take a moment to comment and tell us what you think. Some basic HTML is allowed for formatting.

Reader Comments

In his defense, since I’ve long said that I’m rather fond of the young fellow, he did say “Liberals in Washington” instead of “liberals” in general, which I’d say was a different breed than, say, liberals in Florida or liberals in North Dakota (both of them). I know why he said it (pandering to a distinct set of potential voters in TN) but I also realize that if he’s spent a lot of time around lobbyists from the ACLU or Barry Lynde’s crowd, he’s heard his fair share of opinion that “Jesus” should be uttered away from the land that is owned by the gov’t.

Oh, man, are you bashing a Democrat & I come in to defend the guy? Is the earth still rotating? :)

[faints]

It always amazes me that people think that due to our past history of slavery that African Americans must automatically support gay marriage. Ridiculous! I suppose we also won’t be allowed to denounce beastiality or polygamy was they too become the latest liberal cause. Also, to refer to any black person that opposes gay marriage as a bigot is extremely short-sighted. In the end you will alienate the very people that are needed to support Democratic candidates.

No one likes to be called names. Do you really want to make African Americans feel unwanted in the Democratic Party? Keep in mind that the Republicans only need to peel of 35% of that vote to make Democrats a permanent minority party in this country.

It always amazes me that people think that due to our past history of slavery that African Americans must automatically support gay marriage.

I don’t think that way. I think that African Americans should support gay marriage for the reason everyone else should: because it is the right thing to do.

I suppose we also won’t be allowed to denounce beastiality or polygamy was they too become the latest liberal cause.

You are allowed to do whatever you want. It won’t matter whether beastiality ever becomes a “liberal cause” (it won’t, and it’s either dumb or malicious to pretend it will) - then support it or denounce it or stay silent about it, I don’t care. It won’t change what is right and what is wrong now - and those who oppose gay marriage are wrong. I’ll leave it up to you to figure out why they are wrong - what makes them choose the wrong side of this… Maybe it’s bigotry. Maybe it’s ignorance. Maybe it’s political expediency. Whatever it is that causes that goes by a name — and I’m a believer in the notion that people should wear the shoe that fits. It puzzles me that people who don’t want to be called names choose to do the things that go by those names. I don’t want to be called a bigot, so I don’t behave like one… you know? The only reason I would act like one would be if I really believed there was no shame in it, you know?